Planning Matters. An overview of current and recent issues in which CPRE Warwickshire is actively involved

 

<

M42 Junction 4 junction alteration (Jan 2019)

The proposed highway scheme is summarised below.

  • The scheme that forms the basis of this WCHAR is the proposed reconfiguration of Junction 4 of the M42 to allow access to a new motorway service area (MSA)

  • The off-site highway work proposals involve the widening of the M42 J4 southbound off slip and provision of an additional access road for the MSA. Additionally the roundabout will be reconfigured from three lanes to four circulatory lanes at the northern and western quadrants. To the south east, Gate Lane will be widened to provide three westbound lanes and a single eastbound lane

  • A new pedestrian footbridge will be provided to the north of the circulatory carriageway of the north bridge to assist with pedestrian movements across the junction. This is a replacement of the existing footway that under the proposals will be converted into an additional traffic lane.

  • A single public right of way (footpath SL56) crosses the development site. This footpath will be diverted around the MSA and therefore the current level of pedestrian connectivity between Monkspath and Dorridge will be maintained

  •  

This entry is to alert you to the above plan so you can approach Solihull Council with any comments and concerns when the application is open for public comment.

 

CPRE Warwickshire's position which submitted in  Feb 2017, follows.....

 

 

 

PLANNING APPLICATION   PL/2016/02754/MAJFOT

Response to planning application for a proposed motorway service area at M42 J4

 

The CPRE wish to object and make the following comments on the planning application above.

Although there is a perceived need for a Motorway Service Area between Junctions 3 and 7a of the M42, his proposal is significantly smaller than that proposed for J6, there are several disadvantages with this being located adjacent to Junction 4 and there is an alternative site that would be appropriate.

 

This junction is already quite complex with access to the Blythe Valley Business Park in addition to the A34/A3400, and it is extremely busy during most of the day. The business park is scheduled to see further development in the near future, with both additional business use and the probable housing development agreed in the Solihull Local Plan. This development will invariably see a significant increase in traffic in the local area and particularly at this junction. The further development of a Motorway Service Area will bring event more traffic both from those using the service area and those who will work there to provide the services.

 

Although the proposed site is much smaller than others previously suggested, it still lies on green belt land. Such a development would erode the buffer between the main settlement of Solihull and surrounding villages. There is no case to answer for special circumstances required to remove this area from the Green Belt, as a sequential test of alternative sites has not been fully addressed. Please see attached proposal.

 

The site is also close to the River Blythe which is prone to flooding. It is also close to an SSSI. Reference to putting the parking and buildings below the current ground level is also a concern, as the surrounding area is underlain by impermeable rocks which means that rainwater cannot penetrate. The implication from this is that flooding of the site is a distinct possibility.

 

For the reasons given above, we therefore respectfully request that this application is refused.

 

 

You can download the "junction scematics by clicking the link below.......

Schematics of the proposed M42 Junction 4 changes
MSA off-site highway works M42 Junction [...]
Adobe Acrobat document [1.5 MB]
LAND EAST OF KENILWORTH The plan calls for part of Glasshouse Lane to be used as part of the spine road. That would mean two main things
1) Given there will be possibly 3000 more cars using the route,  the peak hour traffic would will be much higher than now. All current road users, particularly those living on or just off the part of Glasshouse Lane that will become a spine, will be impacted.
2) The southwestern end of Glasshouse Lane/ Birches Lane will be used instead of the new spine road by many wanting to go into or north or northwest of Kenilworth. Current dwellers will be impacted by that.
An aim of the plan is to enhance Kenilworth for existing dwellers. A proper spine road through the entire new housing area from Leamington Road to Crewe Lane would reduce the impact. The current plan adds impact.
You might wish to comment to the Council on this.
 
Other points will be communicated later once we have digested the whole of the matter. 
 
Alan Palmer
TOWN COUNCIL MEETING 7:30 THURS 17 JAN 
 
This entry is to alert those who had not seen the news about the development plan for the eastern side of Kenilworth including the, so called, link road.  
The images below include maps
tHERE IS AN OPEN MEETING THIS THURSDAY 17 JAN AT 7:30 IN THE TOWN HALL.
There are many aspects to be studied and commented on, this email concentrates on the spine road aspect.
As somebody who lives off Glasshouse Lane, I have to highlight the fact that I'm personally affected. I'm guessing, though, that I won't be alone in that.

See also the panel below

 

LOCAL PLANS – progress report November 2018

            

SOLIHULL.  

  • The draft Local Plan, consultation winter 2018/19.  Publication of submission draft summer 2019.  Submission to S of S autumn 2019. Examination winter 2019/20.  Adoption spring /summer 2020
  • HS2.  The first station to be built outside London will be built in Solihull next to the M42 and opposite the NEC.  This will have massive impact in the area.  The GB will be affected.
  • Neighbourhood plans nearing the referendum stage are for Knowle, Dorridge, Bentley Heath.

WARWICK.  

  • As previously reported massive housing permissions were granted earlier and are now being built south west of Leamington.
  • Cllr Mobbs has been contacted to discuss the Governments recent guidance on revision of housing number projections.  A holding reply has been received.

COVENTRY.  

Representations made on housing number projections which are much lower than the very high figures currently used.  No reply received’

 

NUNEATON AND BEDWORTH.

 

  • Main modifications have been published, objection period runs until 3rd December.  A CPRE response will be made to some of the new proposals that are contentious.
  • There was a report on the 650 dwelling development on Poplars Farm.  WWC objections on highway grounds has been resolved by providing more access points.
  • The North Warwickshire and Hinkley College plan to build 221 homes on their carparks have still not come forward.
  • Proposed cycle route has resulted in a new group being formed, the Eliot Gardens and Woodlands Residential Committee.

RUGBY

  • At the Main Modification stage. 

NORTH WARWICKSHIRE

  The Inspector is supposed to come back with interim conclusions, but not yet published.

 

STRATFORD ON AVON

  • Local Plan in place, but two very large, contentious applications continue to dominate.  CPRE have objected to both the Long Marston Airfield 18/01892/OUT and the Stratford SW Relief Road 18/01883/FUL applications.
  • The SSWRR is an application by the developer, Cala Homes, and not the highway authority.  The letter of objection is very detailed and is on 2 x A4 sheets.
  • The Long Marston Garden Village application is again very detailed and is on 3 x A4 sheets.
  • In essence CPRE contends that there is no need for this development because the housing requirement in the Core Strategy is based on 14,500 houses (2014) but now the projections are 19% lower when based on the (2016) projection.  This is because the new edition of the NPPF proposes to use the 2016 figures.  This runs contrary to Government target of 300,000 new house a year.   CPRE County Branch Forum has set up a working group to draft a response. 
  • As the housing requirement is now so much lower than previously stated there is no need for the LMA development and hence no need for the SSWRR. 

WELLESBOURNE AIRFIELD UPDATE

A final decision on the future of Wellesbourne Airfield will be made on 17th January, when a legal appeal by the tenants will be heard.

Back in June judge Richard Haydn Williams ruled that Littler Investments, who own the airfield, were not required to offer new leases to businesses at the site, effectively meaning they would have six weeks to leave.

The businesses were quick to challenge thatverdict and their appeal is set to be held in January.Businesses at Wellesbourne Airfield are fighting to prevent the landowners, from demolishing buildings at the site and selling the land for the development of up to 1,500 homes. Since the court ruling in the summer Stratford District Council have begun a process of compulsory purchase to acquire the airfield to safeguard its long-term future. The move reinforces the authority’s determination to uphold its adopted Core Strategy, which stipulates that flying functions at the airfield should be retained and enhanced.However the compulsory purchase procedure this does not protect the airfield in the short term and the businesses need the appeal to go their way to stand any chance of staying.

 

 

 

PLANNING OFFICER AREA REPORTS November 2018

 

RAMBLERS.   SDC planners are now much more favourably disposed to Rambler’s views.  It was noted that the County Minerals Plan review which had cut the number of gravel extraction sites from 9 to 5.  The large one at Barford remains in the Plan.

 

SOLIHULL.  

  • 2 applications for motorway service stations on the M42 near Solihull.  Highways England are objecting until they have resolved the other motorway improvements.  Decision expected in the New Year.
  • Land adjoining Shady Lane.  Proposed bungalow in the GB.  Objected.  Application refused.
  • 200 dwellings and infrastructure.  Tidbury Green.  Objected.  No decision
  • Lido site, Park Avenue, Solihull. Residential development which abuts the GB and should be designated a Local Wildlife Site.  Planning application expected shortly.

 

NORTH WARWICKSHIRE.  Daw Mill.  WCC will oversee the re-instatement of the former colliery site to its’ original condition.

 

WARWICK. 

  • There are at least 3 active construction sites for HS2. 
  • Development South of Warwick now show plans for 2 new schools 
  • Government has set up a body to consider and advise on Design when considering applications.

 

RUGBY.  At the Modifications stage. 

 

NUNEATON AND BEDWORTH.  

  • Air quality issues which, though very serious, are largely ignored.
  • The live applications are as set out under the Local Plan’s section.

 

AVON AND ARDEN

  • Cherington, North Farm.  Objected.  Further discussion in Exec and the letter of objection was withdrawn.  Delegated refusal.  Revised application
  • Haselor.  Standby Gas Powered Standby Facility.  Withdrawn
  • Hockley Heath.  Retention of development including a 60 bedroom hotel.  Delegated refusal.
  • Kitebrook. Replacement house.  Refusal, appeal.
  • Long Marston.  5 houses.  Refusal
  • Stratford on Avon.  Avon Lodge, Ryon Hill.  Delegated refusal
  • Stratford on Avon.  Replace 1 house with 4 and build 2 others.  Very sensitive site.  Very weak objections from others.  Strong report from the Conservation Officer.  Delegated refusal
  • Temple Grafton. Listed dovecote in extreme disrepair.  LA’s can require owners of listed buildings to repair them.  Jean will help Nicholas with this application.
  • Welford on Avon.  7 applications; 2 refused, 3 permission, 2 withdrawn
  • Wellesbourne.  2 applications, both pending.

National Planning Policy Framework The new NPPF was published on 26th July. This basically continues a framework where sustainable development is permitted subject to many checks and balances including the existing system of Local and Neighbourhood Plans. The definition of “sustainability” is largely unchanged and refers to Economic, Social and Environmental aspects of proposals. It is difficult to escape the thought that the environment is subsidiary to the other aspects.

 

THE PROPOSED STRATFORD SOUTH-WESTERN RELIEF ROAD

 

 

It has come. For two years we have been waiting for a formal planning application to build a relief road from the housing development at Long Marston to Stratford-upon-Avon and now it has appeared – 18/01883/FUL.

 

That the town has a traffic problem, there is no doubt whatever. But this road, that would cross the Avon on high concrete stilts and effectively wreck the south west environs of Stratford-upon-Avon, would not solve this problem, rather exacerbate it. It would be physically perfectly hideous and provide more tailbacks, mess and muddle.

 

It is, simply, the wrong road in the wrong place.

 

To combat this menace, the Stratford Residents Action Group was formed and its legal team is at work on the plans with the immediate intention of having the application called in by the Secretary of State.

 

CPRE Warwickshire wholeheartedly supports SRAG and we will keep you informed of developments. 

 

                                                                               Nicholas Butler

CPRE National  has highlighted several key concerns –

• a failure to provide an effective brownfield first policy. (Warwickshire Branch has criticised the general failure of Local Plans to specify Phasing of development which leads to building in something of a piecemeal manner and certainly not ‘brownfield first’)

• the continuing failure to support provision of affordable housing in rural areas

• the discouragement of neighbourhood planning because of uncertainty over the validity of plans older than two years

• continued implicit support for hydraulic fracturing for shale oil and gas, despite massive public opposition and little evidence of need

 

The Branch is concerned that another QUANGO is being established in our area. This is ‘Midlands Connect’ made up of County Councils and Local Enterprise Partnerships across the East and West Midlands. It will be engaged in planning behind the scenes, this time of transport. Notably, environmental groups and Parish Councils are not part of it.

 

 

Potential Cotswolds National Park We have been represented at meetings about this proposal. The announcement by Michael Gove of a review of designated areas and potential for there to be more national parks at end of May has stimulated much more thinking and discussion of this concept.

 

HS2.   Substantial excavations are taking place alongside the lane from Offchurch to Hunningham which is apparently associated with preliminary work on HS2. There are also reports of work on HS2 starting elsewhere, such as Crackley. Meanwhile a Press Release from HS2 dated 25th June 2018 promises – “HS2 plans for unprecedented ‘green corridor’ stretching alongside the railway”.

Nuneaton and Bedworth Borough Planning

There has been a political change following the May elections where the long-standing portfolio holder for planning lost his seat as did many other members of the controlling party and one of the two from the Green party. The current situation of 17 Labour,16 Conservative and 1 green vote leads to a 17/17 stalemate normally with the Mayor taking the casting vote.

A National Park?

The Meriden Green Belt is under particular pressure from development so proposals have been drawn up by Kathryn Moore, Professor of Landscape Architecture at Birmingham City University, to make the region home to the UK’s 16th official National Park. The vision has already gained support from West Midlands Mayor Andy Street, Meriden MP Dame Caroline Spelman and other key bodies around the region. We have discussed this matter with Caroline Spelman and will also do so with Andy Street at our next meeting, pointing out that, while we would support such a proposal we would request that the area, which is to be funded by biodiversty-offsetting from the HS2 project, should be called a “regional park, so as not to de-value the status of the existing National Parks.”

 

 

DEMOCRATIC CONTROL OF PLANNING

IS UNDER THREAT

 

 

 

Democratically-controlled town and country planning in Warwickshire and the West Midlands is under a grave threat if action is not taken, says CPRE Warwickshire, “Unelected, opaque, single-agenda Local Enterprise Partnerships (LEPs) will increasingly rule the roost not just on economic development but also on planning, housing and transport, promoting the interests of themselves and their members in the process. Local democracy will have been largely lost.”

CPRE Warwickshire has today published a detailed report on how these new unelected bodies are quietly taking over town and country planning, with the councillors on local authorities apparently unable to stop a dangerous trend. It is based on detailed research into the mode of operating, and conduct, of the Coventry & Warwickshire Local Enterprise Partnership and its neighbour the Greater Birmingham & Solihull LEP.

“This report, which has been prepared by our members in Warwickshire, makes depressing reading”, said Mark Sullivan, Technical Secretary of the CPRE in the county. “If the trend continues our councillors will find that they have little power to influence planning policy, or the scale of development. Their voters will find that decisions are made behind closed doors and imposed on everyone. This has to stop.

“The LEPs and some local authority planners are increasingly disregarding those parts of the Government’s National Planning Policy Framework that aim to temper growth by, for example, preserving the Green Belt or protecting and enhancing the environment generally. The Government’s recent attempts to strengthen Green Belt policy are effectively being ignored. 

Our report recommends that LEPs should focus more specifically on economic development, acting as no more than consultees on related topics such as housing, planning and transport. They should also seek to develop a more open and transparent approach, including agreeing to be subject to the Freedom of Information Act and Environmental Information Regulations as local authorities already are. Local authorities should take steps to involve all their councillors in key decisions.

“Local authorities can stop this drift away from democracy by declining to give more of a role to the LEP, and recovering powers to use them themselves.”

Members of Parliament for Warwickshire, Coventry and Solihull constituencies are being sent the report, which is attached.

 

CONTACT DETAILS   CPRE Warwickshire, 41A, Smith Street, Warwick CV34 4JA

                                 01926 494597

                                 Click this to email us

                                               www.cprewarwickshire.org.uk

                                 Charity No 1092486, Company No 427 9451

Print Print | Sitemap
© CPRE Warwickshire Branch